|Full visibility of Carrier Ethernet Service OAM across Customer, Provider and Operator domains|
Carrier Ethernet services are already estimated at US$30 billion globally. Its growth rate is primarily due to its flexibility, cost-effective scale and low cost-per-bit. Carrier Ethernet’s adoption has been bolstered by the combined efforts of Communications Service Providers (CSPs)and equipment vendors within the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF). Cost benefits aside, the network performance management challenge remains how to manage the multi-vendor landscape and resultant proprietary performance metric calculations and methods, while trying to adapt to the MEF-defined best practices of Service OAM Performance Management.
First, with InfoVista’s Carrier Ethernet network performance management solution, the CSP can manage the three domains of resources, usage and end-to-end performance. Second, the CSP can enable management from a service perspective so that the following can all be tied back to that service: EVCs, UNIs, ENNIs, their usage, adherence to CIRs/EIRs, traffic volumes, end-to-end frame delay, inter-frame delay variation and frame loss ratios. Third, InfoVista’s solution can handle the multiple equipment vendors that provide Carrier Ethernet-based equipment and normalize vendor-specific performance data to provide the necessary MEF-aligned view of the services’ performance for the network operations, engineering, planning and service management teams.
Designed for the capacity and scale requirements of CSPs, InfoVista’s Carrier Ethernet network performance management delivers out-of-the-box support for leading equipment vendors, such as Cisco, Alcatel-Lucent, Adva, Huawei, RAD, Ciena and Juniper. InfoVista’s platform offers CSPs their own self-service platform to extend KPI definition and collection to additional equipment vendors using SNMP, XML and flat-file-based data sources.
Using MEF-aligned service types, such as E-Lines and ELANs, the engineer, planner and service desk can all see the relationship between customers, services, infrastructure and end-to-end Ethernet OAM performance, both historically and in real time.
The MEF has delivered a performance management implementation agreement, but the instrumentation isn’t necessarily available in all equipment using the same standards (e.g. Y.1731-based performance attributes like MEF’s 10.2 specification’s availability). By using composite KPIs and object models, these disparate technical indicators can be normalized to show consistent end-to-end performance metrics for operations, engineering and planning.
With self-service analytics, historical reporting, user-configurable thresholds and alerts, and multiple views based on maps, lists and freehand drawings that provide the individual NOC engineer complete control of their management domain.